Returning to the roots. A Comment on the Paper Alliance in Common Factor Land: A View through the Research Lens

Published: December 28, 2011
Abstract Views: 941
PDF: 597
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

In his interesting paper “Alliance in Common Factor Land: A View through the Research Lens†Horvath (2011) takes us through the critical aspects of therapeutic alliance researches and the challenges that researchers still have to face. The author discusses several complex issues from the historical background of the construct to the critical aspects of its measurement, and concluding with the proposal of a research agenda. The key topic of Horvath’s (2011) paper is the necessity for a better definition of therapeutic alliance construct, one that would (a) recognize the similarities and differences among the different kinds of therapeutic alliance definitions; and (b) differentiate the components of the therapeutic relationship.  As Horvath reminds us in his paper, the problem of differentiation between therapeutic alliance and other components of the relationship originates from Greenson’s (1965) tripartition of therapeutic relationship in transference, working alliance, and real relationship.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Colli, A. (2011). Returning to the roots. A Comment on the Paper Alliance in Common Factor Land: A View through the Research Lens. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 14(2), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2011.71

Similar Articles

<< < 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.