https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2022.606
Reliability and factorial validity of long and brief versions of the inventory of personality organization in a Latvian sample
Submitted: January 10, 2022
Accepted: April 27, 2022
Published: June 30, 2022
Accepted: April 27, 2022
Abstract Views: 1995
PDF: 859
HTML: 148
HTML: 148
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The aim of this study was to examine the construct validity and reliability of long and brief versions (57 and 16 items) of the inventory of personality organization (IPO) in a Latvian nonclinical sample. The actuality of this study is dictated by the number of persons suffering from personality disorders, and the excessive need for reliable constructs for the assessment of personality in the normality-abnormality range. The total number of participants of the study was 1118, recruited in several subsamples, which were employed for the investigation of the factor structure, psychometric properties, test-retest, and convergent validity of the IPO-57 and IPO-16 scales. The 3-factor structure, obtained by confirmatory factor analysis, was replicated in the Latvian-speaking sample for long and brief IPO versions. Both constructs achieved adequate model fit psychometric indices and sufficient internal consistency, and the test-retest reliability was also approved. The convergent validity of IPO with aggressivity, negative affectivity, and non-adaptive personality measures was established. In the current study, we adapted a very fundamental psychodynamic/psychoanalytic construct in the Latvian language and replicated the previously empirically established IPO three-dimensional model, whereas the novelty in IPO construct convergent validity research was the establishment of convergent validity with non-adaptive personality traits measured by the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF). Both versions of IPO are recommended for further use in the research in Latvian language samples, for clinical purposes to assess the level of psychic functioning, and for treatment planning and evaluation purposes.
American Psychiatric Association (2013a). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
American Psychiatric Association (2013b). Online assessment measures: The Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF) - Adult. Available from: https://www.psychiatry.org/File%20Library/Psychiatrists/Practice/DSM/APA_DSM5_The-Personality-Inventory-For-DSM-5-Brief-Form-Adult.pdf
Barreto, J. F., Matias, M., Carvalho, H. M., & Matos, P. M. (2017). Uncovering personality structure with the Inventory of Personality Organization: An exploration of factor structure with a Portuguese sample. European Review of Applied Psychology/Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 67(5), 247-257. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2017.08.001.
Berghuis, H., Kamphuis, J. H., Boedijn, G., & Verheul, R. (2009). Psychometric properties and validity of the Dutch Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO-NL). Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 73, 44-60. doi:10.1521/bumc.2009.73.1.44.
Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452-459. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452.
Central Statistical Bureau Republic of Latvia. (2021). IRE020. Population, population change and key vital statistics by ethnicity 1980-2021. Official Statistics portal. Available from: https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/en/OSP_PUB/START__POP__IR__IRE/IRE020/ Accessed: November 1, 2021
Clarkin, F. J., Caligor, E., Stern, B., & Kernberg, O. F. (2017). Structured Interview of Personality Organization-Revised (STIPO-R). The Center for Transference-focused Psychotherapy. Available from: https://www.borderlinedisorders.com/assets/STIPORmanual.July2021.pdf
de Starceva-Apele, A., & Rascevska, M. (2022). Relationship of capacity to love with personality organization and non-adaptive personality traits [Manuscript in preparation]. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Psychology and Art, University of Latvia.
Doering S., & Horz, S. (2012). Handbuch der Strukturdiagnostik: Konzepte, Instrumente, Praxis. Schattauer GmbH.
Ellison, W. D., & Levy, K. N. (2012). Factor structure of the primary scales of the Inventory of Personality Organization in a nonclinical sample using exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 24, 503-517. doi:10.1037/a0026264.
Erikson, E. H. (1956). The Problem of Ego Identity. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 4, 56-121. doi:10.1177/000306515600400104.
European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations. (2013). EFPA Review Model for the Description and Evaluation of Psychological and Educational Tests, version 4.2.6. Available from: http://assessment.efpa.eu/documents-/
Fairbairn, W. D. (1946). Object-relationships and dynamic structure. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 27(1-2), 30-37.
Freud, S. (1962). On the Psychical Mechanism of Hysterical Phenomena: A Lecture. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 3, pp. 25-39). Hogarth Press.
Gaitniece-Putane, A. (2008). Relationship of aggression, emotional intelligence and stoicism for men and women in age of 20-25 and 30-35 (Publication No. 10094) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Latvia]. E-resource repository of the University of Latvia. Available from: https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/4530
Haig B. D. (2005). Exploratory factor analysis, theory generation, and scientific method. Multivariate behavioural research, 40(3), 303-329. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4003_2.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. IBM Corp.
Igarashi, H., Kikuchi, H., Kano, R., Mitoma, H., Shono, M., Hasui, C., & Kitamura, T. (2009). The inventory of personality organisation: its psychometric properties among student and clinical populations in Japan. Annals of General Psychiatry, 8, 9. doi:10.1186/1744-859X-8-9.
Jang, L. K., & Vernon, P. A. (2018). Genetics. In W. J. Livesley & R. Larstone (Eds.), Handbook of personality disorders: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 235-250). Guilford Press.
Jorgensen, C. R. (2018). Identity. In W. J. Livesley & R. Larstone (Eds.), Handbook of personality disorders: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 107-122). Guilford Press.
Kernberg, O. F. (1965). Notes on countertransference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 13, 38-56. doi:10.1177/000306516501300102.
Kernberg, O. F. (1984). Severe personality disorders. Yale University Press.
Kernberg, O. F. (2012). The inseparable nature of love and aggression: Clinical and theoretical perspectives. American Psychiatric Publishing.
Kernberg, O. F. (2015). Neurobiological correlates of object relations theory: The relationship between neurobiological and psychodynamic development. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 24(1), 38-46. doi:10.1080/0803706X.2014.912352.
Kernberg, O. F., & Caligor, E. (2005). A psychoanalytic theory of personality disorders. In M. F. Lenzenweger & J. F. Clarkin (Eds.), Major theories of personality disorders (pp. 114-156). Guilford Press.
Klein, M. (1935). A contribution to the psychogenesis of manic-depressive states. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 16, 145-174.
Knight, Z. G. (2021). A re-consideration of interpretation. A relational approach. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 24(3). doi:10.4081/ripppo.2021.555.
Koelen, J. A., Luyten, P., Eurelings-Bontekoe, L. H., Diguer, L., Vermote, R., Lowyck, B., & Bühring, M. E. (2012). The impact of level of personality organization on treatment response: a systematic review. Psychiatry, 75(4), 355-374. doi:10.1521/psyc.2012.75.4.355.
Lenzenweger, M. F., Clarkin, J. F., Kernberg, O. F., & Foelsch, P. A. (2001). The inventory of personality organization: Psychometric properties, factorial composition, and criterion relations with affect, aggressive dyscontrol, psychosis proneness, and self domains in a nonclinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 13, 577-591. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.13.4.577.
Livesley, W. J. (2018). Conceptual Issues. In W. J. Livesley & R. Larstone (Eds.), Handbook of personality disorders: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 3-24). Guilford Press.
Luyten, P., & Fonagy, P. (2021). Integrating and differentiating personality and psychopathology: A psychodynamic perspective. Journal of Personality, 1-14. doi:10.1111/jopy.12656.
Morgan, T. A., & Zimmerman, N. (2018). Epidemiology of personality disorders. In W. J. Livesley & R. Larstone (Eds.), Handbook of personality disorders: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 173-196). Guilford Press.
Preti, E., Prunas, A., De Panfilis, C., Marchesi, C., Madeddu, F., & Clarkin, J. F. (2015). The facets of identity: personality pathology assessment through the inventory of personality organization. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 6, 129-140. doi:10.1037/per0000119.
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
Savalei, V., & Rhemtulla, M. (2013). The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66(2), 201-223. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02049.x.
Sellbom, M., & Tellegen, A. (2019). Factor analysis in psychological assessment research: Common pitfalls and recommendations. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1428-1441. doi:10.1037/pas0000623.
Siever L. J. (2005). Endophenotypes in the personality disorders. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 7(2), 139-151. doi:10.31887/DCNS.2005.7.2/lsiever.
Smith, R., & Solms, M. (2018). Examination of the hypothesis that repression is premature automatization: A psychoanalytic case report and discussion. Neuropsychoanalysis, 20(1), 47-61. doi:10.1080/15294145.2018.1473045.
Sollberger, D., Gremaud-Heitz, D., Riemenschneider, A., Küchenhoff, J., Dammann, G., & Walter, M. (2011). Associations between identity diffusion, Axis II disorder, and psychopathology in inpatients with borderline personality disorder. Psychopathology, 45(1), 15-21. doi:10.1159/000325104.
Stern, B. L., Caligor, E., Clarkin, J. F., Critchfield, K. L., Horz, S., MacCornack, V., & Kernberg, O. F. (2010). Structured interview of personality organization (STIPO): preliminary psychometrics in a clinical sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 35-44. doi:10.1080/00223890903379308.
Stover, J. B., Castro Solano, A., & Fernández Liporace, M. (2019). Dysfunctional personality traits: relationship with Five Factor Model, adaptation and symptomatology in a community sample from Buenos Aires. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 22(2). doi:10.4081/ripppo.2019.343.
Upmane, A. (2010). Factors predicting satisfaction with life: quantitative and qualitative analysis (Publication No. 34390) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Latvia]. E-resource repository of the University of Latvia. Available from: https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/4844
Verreault, M., Sabourin, S., Lussier, Y., Normandin, L., & Clarkin, J. F. (2013). Assessment of personality organization in couple relationships: Factorial structure of the inventory of personality organization and incremental validity over neuroticism. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(1), 85-95. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.713883.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
Werbart, A., Aldèn, S., & Diedrichs, A. (2017). Changes in the anaclitic-introjective personality configurations following psychoanalytic psychotherapy with young adults. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 20(1). doi:10.4081/ripppo.2017.239.s
Yeomans, F. E., Clarkin, J. F., & Kernberg, O. F. (2015). Transference-focused psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: A clinical guide. American Psychiatric Association.
Zarrella, I., Russolillo, L. A., Caviglia, G., & Perrella, R. (2017). Continuity and discontinuity between psychopathology of childhood and adulthood: a review on retrospective and prospective studies. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 20(2). doi:10.4081/ripppo.2017.248.
Zimmermann, J., Benecke, C., Hörz, S., Rentrop, M., Peham, D., Bock, A., Wallner, T., Schauenburg, H., Frommer, J., Huber, D., Clarkin, J. F., & Dammann, G. (2013). Validierung einer deutschsprachigen 16-Item-Version des Inventarsder Persönlichkeitsorganisation (IPO-16) [Validity of a German 16-item version of the Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO-16)]. Diagnostica, 59, 3-16. doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000076.
How to Cite
de Starceva-Apele, A. ., & Rascevska, M. (2022). Reliability and factorial validity of long and brief versions of the inventory of personality organization in a Latvian sample. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2022.606
Copyright (c) 2022 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Cristina Marogna, Chiara Masaro, Vincenzo Calvo, Simona Ghedin, Floriana Caccamo, The extended unconscious group field and metabolization of pandemic experience: dreaming together to keep cohesion alive , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 25 No. 3 (2022): SPECIAL ISSUE: "Group psychotherapy: between settled benchmarks and new horizons"
- Diego Rocco, Vincenzo Calvo, Vito Agrosì, Francesca Bergami, Luce Maria Busetto, Silvia Marin, Giovanna Pezzetta, Luca Rossi, Lorenzo Zuccotti, Allan Abbass, Intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy provided by novice psychotherapists: effects on symptomatology and psychological structure in patients with anxiety disorders , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 24 No. 1 (2021)
- Joseph A. Hirsch, An American scientist's iconoclastic response to Psychotherapies for Anxiety and Depression: benefits and costs , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 20 No. 2 (2017)
- Cecilia Serena Pace, Ester D'Onofrio, Viviana Guerriero, Giulio Cesare Zavattini, A proposal for a brief-term post-adoption intervention in the attachment-perspective: a single case study with a late-adopted child and his adoptive mother , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 19 No. 1 (2016): Special issue on Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy: part 2
- Vasiliki Yotsidi, Theodora Anastasiou, Konstantinos Doulgeris, Panagiota Theodosiou, Clive Richardson, Trauma focused-cognitive behavioral therapy training effectiveness in promoting professional development of psychotherapists working with unaccompanied minors in Greece: a non-blinded randomized control trial , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 27 No. 2 (2024)
- Marco Tonti, Omar C.G. Gelo, Rate of speech and emotional-cognitive regulation in the psychotherapeutic process: a pilot study , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 19 No. 2 (2016)
- Giovanna Esposito, Anna Sara Cutolo, Raffaella Passeggia, Silvia Formentin, Miguel Mario Gonçalves, Tracking change in group interventions: a further adaptation of the innovative moments coding system for groups , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 25 No. 3 (2022): SPECIAL ISSUE: "Group psychotherapy: between settled benchmarks and new horizons"
- Emanuela Brusadelli, Laura Ferrari, Michele Benetti, Stefania Bruzzese, Giada Maria Tonelli, Salvatore Gullo, Online Supportive Group as social intervention to face COVID lockdown. A qualitative study on psychotherapists, psychology trainees and students, and community people , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 23 No. 3 (2020)
- Lidia Borghi, Federica Bonazza, Giulia Lamiani, Alessandro Musetti, Tommaso Manari, Maria Filosa, Maria C. Quattropani, Vittorio Lenzo, Maria Francesca Freda, Daniela Lemmo, Emanuela Saita, Roberto Cattivelli, Gianluca Castelnuovo, Elena Vegni, Christian Franceschini, Dreaming during lockdown: a quali-quantitative analysis of the Italian population dreams during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 24 No. 2 (2021): SPECIAL ISSUE "Working on dreams, from psychotherapy to neuroscience"
- Zelda Gillian Knight, Psychotherapy with two late adulthood children of the colonies , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 20 No. 3 (2017)
<< < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
