https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2020.450
Further data on the reliability of the mentalization imbalances scale and of the modes of mentalization scale
Submitted: January 22, 2020
Accepted: April 8, 2020
Published: May 21, 2020
Accepted: April 8, 2020
Abstract Views: 813
PDF: 513
HTML: 28
HTML: 28
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The aim of this study was to provide data on the Inter-Rater Reliability (IRR) and the test-retest reliability of the Mentalization Imbalances Scale (MIS) and the Modes of Mentalization Scale (MMS) in two different studies. Three junior raters and two senior raters assessed blindly 15 session transcripts of psychotherapy of five patients, using both the MIS and the MMS. The same 15 sessions were rated after the junior raters completed a training at the use of the scales and after on month from the end of the training to assess testretest reliability. Four therapists used the MIS and the MMS to provide different ratings of 22 patients undergoing a psychotherapy in different settings. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) values ranged from sufficient to good and increased after the training. Test re-test reliability was sufficient for both scales (Study 1). ICC values ranged from sufficient to good, and were globally higher than the ones found in the first study sample (Study 2). Our results provide support to the inter-rater reliability of the MIS and the MMS.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42 (2), 241–251.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00715
Bateman, A.W., Bolton, R., & Fonagy, P. (2013). Antisocial personality disorder: A mentalizing framework. The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychoanalysis, XI (2),178–186. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.11.2.178
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.11.2.178
Bateman, A.W., & Fonagy, P. (2004). Psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder. Mentalization based treatment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780198527664.001.0001
Bateman A.W., & Fonagy, P. (2016). Mentalization Based Treatment for Personality Disorders: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780199680375.001.0001
Blackshaw, A.J., Kinderman, Hare, D. J., & Hatton, C. (2001). Theory of mind, causal attribution and paranoia in Asperger syndrome. Autism, 5, 147–163. doi:10.1177/1362361301005002005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361301005002005
Blagov, B., Bi, W., Shedler, J., & Westen, D. (2012). The Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP): Evaluating psychometric questions about its reliability, validity, and fixed score distribution. Assessment, 19(3), 370–382. doi: 10.1177/1073191112436667.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112436667
Davidson, K. M., Obonsawin, M. C., Seils, M., & Patience, L. (2003). Patient and clinician agreement on personality using the SWAP-200. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17 (3), 208-218.doi:10.1521/pedi.17.3.208.22148
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.17.3.208.22148
Dimitrijević, A., Hanak, N., Dimitrijević, A.A., & Marjanović, Z.J. (2017). The Mentalization Scale (MentS): A Self-Report Measure for the Assessment of Mentalizing Capacity, Journal of Personality Assessment, 100 (3), 268-280. doi:10.1080/00223891.2017.1310730
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1310730
Fonagy, P., Leigh, T., Steele, M., Steele, H., Kennedy, R., Mattoon, G., ... Gerber, A. (1996). The relation of attachment status, psychiatric classification, and response to psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64 (1), 22-31. doi:10.1037/0022-006X .64.1.22
Fonagy. P., Luyten, P., Moulton-Perkins, A., Lee, Y.W., Warren, F., Howard, S. … Lowyck, B. (2016). Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Mentalizing: The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. PloS One, 11 (7). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158678
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158678
Fonagy, P., Target, M., Steele, H., & Steele, M. (1998). Reflective- Functioning manual: Version 5 for application to adult attachment interview. Unpublished manual. London: University College.
Gagliardini, G., & Colli, A. (2019). Assessing mentalization: Development and preliminary validation of the Modes of Mentalization Scale. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 36(3), 249-258.doi: 10.1037/pap0000222
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pap0000222
Gagliardini, G., Gullo, S., Caverzasi, E., Boldrini, A., Blasi, S., & Colli, A. (2018). Assessing mentalization in psychotherapy: First validation of the Mentalization Imbalances Scale. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 21(3), 164-177. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2018.339
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2018.339
Hausberg, M.C., Schulz, H., Piegler, T., Happach, C.G., Klöpper, M., Brütt, A.L. … Andreas, S. (2012). Is a self-rated instrument appropriate to assess mentalization in patients with mental disorders? Development and first validation of the mentalization questionnaire (MZQ). Psychotherapy Research, 22 (6), 699-709. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2012.709325
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2012.709325
Huprich, S.K., Bornstein, R.F. & Schmitt, T.A. (2011). Self-report methodology is insufficient for improving the assessment and classification of Axis II personality disorders. Journal Personality Disorder, 25 (5), 557-70. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.5.557.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.5.557
Katznelson, H. (2014). Reflective function: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(2), 107–117.doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.12.00
Lievens, F. (2001). Assessor training strategies and their effects on accuracy, interrater reliability, and discriminant validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (2), 255-264. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.86.2.255
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.2.255
Meehan, K.B., Levy, K.N., Reynoso, J.S., Hill, L.L., & Clarkin, J.F. (2009). Measuring reflective function with a multidimensional rating scale: comparison with scoring reflective function on the AAI. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 57 (1), 208-13. doi: 10.1177/00030651090570011008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651090570011008
Morey, L.C. (2014). Borderline features are associated with inaccurate trait self-estimations. Borderline Personality Disorders and Emotion Dysregulation, 1 (1), 4. doi: 10.1186/2051-6673-1-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2051-6673-1-4
Oakley, B.F.M., Brewer, R., Bird, G., & Catmur, C. (2016). Theory of mind is not theory of emotion: A cautionary note on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125 (6), 818-823. doi:10.1037/abn0000182
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000182
Rudden, M., Milrod, B., Target, M., Ackerman, S., & Graf, E. (2006). Reflective functioning in panic disorder patients: A pilot study. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 54(4), 1339-1343. doi.org/10.1177/00030651060540040109
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651060540040109
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86 (2), 420–428. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
Skårderud, F. (2007). Eating one’s words, part II: The embodied mind and reflective function in anorexia nervosa – theory. European Eating Disorders Review, 15(4), 243–252.doi:10.1002/erv.778
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.778
Sperman, C. (1904). The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15 (1), 72-101.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159
Taubner, S., Hörz, S., Fischer-Kern. M., Doering, S., Buchheim, A., & Zimmermann, J. (2013). Internal structure of the Reflective Functioning Scale. Psychological Assessement, 25 (1), 127-135. doi: 10.1037/a0029138
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029138
Taubner, S., Kessler, H., Buchheim, A., Kächele, H., & Staun, L. (2011). The role of mentalization in the psychoanalytic treatment of chronic depression. Psychiatry, 74 (1), 49–57. doi: 10.1521/psyc.2011.74.1.49
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2011.74.1.49
Westen, D., & Weinberger, D. (2004). When clinical description becomes statistical prediction. American Psychologist, 59 (7), 595-613. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.595
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.595
How to Cite
Gagliardini, G., Gatti, L., & Colli, A. (2020). Further data on the reliability of the mentalization imbalances scale and of the modes of mentalization scale. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2020.450
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Samuel F. Mikail, Paul L. Hewitt, Gordon L. Flett, Sabrina Ge, Group dynamic-relational therapy for perfectionism , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 25 No. 3 (2022): SPECIAL ISSUE: "Group psychotherapy: between settled benchmarks and new horizons"
- Federica Bonazza, Lidia Borghi, Eugenia Cao di San Marco, Kyrie Piscopo, Francesca Bai, Antonella d’Arminio Monforte, Elena Vegni, Psychological outcomes after hospitalization for COVID-19: data from a multidisciplinary follow-up screening program for recovered patients , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 23 No. 3 (2020)
- Massimiliano Sommantico, Ilaria Iorio, Marina Lacatena, Santa Parrello, Dreaming during the COVID-19 lockdown: a comparison of Italian adolescents and adults , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 24 No. 2 (2021): SPECIAL ISSUE "Working on dreams, from psychotherapy to neuroscience"
- Jule Bauckhage, Christian Sell, When and for whom do psychodynamic therapists use guided imagery? Explicating practitioners’ tacit knowledge , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 24 No. 3 (2021)
- Marta Vecchiato, Chiara Sacchi, Alessandra Simonelli, Nicola Purgato, Evaluating the efficacy of psychodynamic treatment on a single case of autism. A qualitative research , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 19 No. 1 (2016): Special issue on Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy: part 2
- Salvatore Gullo, Ilaria Misici, Arianna Teti, Michele Liuzzi, Enrico Chiara, Going through the lockdown: a longitudinal study on the psychological consequences of the coronavirus pandemic , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 23 No. 3 (2020)
- Rosaleen McElvaney, Andrina Monaghan, Christina Treacy, Naoise Delaney, Adolescents’ experiences of psychotherapy following child sexual abuse , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 26 No. 2 (2023)
- Paula Dagnino, Carola Pèrez, Adriana Gòmez, Sergio Gloger, Mariane Krause, Depression and attachment: how do personality styles and social support influence this relation? , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 20 No. 1 (2017)
- Sarah Abraham, Elisabeth Edginton, David Cottrell, Sandy Tubeuf, Measuring health-related quality of life measures in children: lessons from a pilot study , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 25 No. 1 (2022)
- Marjolein M. W. Koementas-de Vos, Lucas C. Colleye, Bea Tiemens, Fabiana Engelsbel, Kim de Jong, Cilia L. M. Witteman, M. Annet Nugter, The feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of a feedback-informed group treatment (FIGT) tool for patients with anxiety or depressive disorders , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 25 No. 3 (2022): SPECIAL ISSUE: "Group psychotherapy: between settled benchmarks and new horizons"
<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
