Assessing personality change with Blatt's anaclitic and introjective configurations and Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure profiles: two case studies in psychodynamic treatment

  • Osmano Oasi | osmano.oasi@unicatt.it Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
  • Laura Buonarrivo Clinical Psychologist, Private Practitioner, Milan, Italy.
  • Alberto Codazzi Private Practitioner, Rome, Italy.
  • Margherita Passalacqua Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
  • Gio Matteo Risso Ricci Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
  • Francesca Straccamore Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Roberto Bezzi ASST Ovest Milanese, Milan, Italy.

Abstract

A growing body of empirical and clinical research attests to the influence of personality features on the development, course and outcome of psychotherapy. Over the last four decades, Blatt adopted a psychoanalytic and cognitive developmental approach in developing a theoretically and empirically grounded two-configurations model of personality. The main aim of this study was to evaluate possible changes in anaclitic and introjective configurations – as measured by the Depressive Experience Questionnaire (DEQ) (Blatt, D’Afflitti, & Quinlan, 1976) – set against simultaneous changes in personality profile measured by Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP-200). Two young patients, a man and a woman, characterized by different personality profiles – introjective and anaclitic, respectively – were assessed for one year in the context of a psychodynamic psychotherapy. A battery of instruments – Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders I and II, Defense Mechanism Rating Scale, DEQ and SWAP-200 – were administered at the beginning, during the assessment process, and after one year. Both patients displayed lower BDI-II scores, along with evident clinical progress. Defence profiles and Core Conflict Relationship Themes showed interesting developments, in keeping with the evolution of the psychotherapy process. Lastly, while DEQ profiles outlined substantial stability after one year, some important changes in SWAP-200 profiles – in particular with regard to Q factors – were observed. Although these findings should be considered as preliminary, these results appear to be consistent with the description of Self-criticism and Dependency as relatively stable personality dimensions. The potential influence of profile diversity – introjective vs anaclitic – on other key variables of the psychotherapy process is also discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2017-04-19
Keywords:
Personality change, Blatt’s anaclitic and introjective configurations, Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure profiles
Statistics
Abstract views: 975

PDF: 326
HTML: 700
Share it

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

How to Cite
Oasi, O., Buonarrivo, L., Codazzi, A., Passalacqua, M., Risso Ricci, G. M., Straccamore, F., & Bezzi, R. (2017). Assessing personality change with Blatt’s anaclitic and introjective configurations and Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure profiles: two case studies in psychodynamic treatment. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2017.231